The Development and Management of Neck Burn Scar Contracture Recurrence: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION: Burn neck contractures pose a great challenge for reconstructive surgeons. A paucity of literature exist regarding long-term outcomes based on different surgical management strategies. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcomes of the treatment of neck burn scar contractures and evaluate surgical strategies according to their long-term effectiveness and associated complications. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted to review outcomes of neck contractures release after burn injury. All patients operated on between January 2009 and February 2023 at a single institution were included. RESULTS: A total of 20 patients developed neck burn scar contracture and were included in this study. The mean age was 32.9 ± 20.3 years. The burn injuries were most commonly thermal (n = 19, 95%). All burn injuries were full-thickness burns, with an average neck defect size of 130.5 ± 106.0 cm2. Overall, 45 surgical scar release procedures were performed on the 20 patients who developed a neck contracture. Patients underwent 1.65 ± 1.04 surgeries on average to address neck contracture. Although 25% of patients only received 1 surgery to treat neck contracture, some patients underwent as many as 8 surgeries. Contracture recurrence (CR) was the most common complication and occurred in 28.9% of the cases. The mean percentage total body surface area did not significantly differ in CR patients (26.7% ± 14.9%) and no-CR patients (44.5% ± 30.2%). However, there was a significant difference (P = 0.01) in the average neck defect size between CR patients (198.5 ± 108.3 cm2) and no-CR patients (81.1 ± 75.1 cm2). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that risk factors for initial burn scar contractures may differ from those associated with CR, highlighting the importance of neck defect size as a predictor. The study also examines various surgical approaches, with Z-plasty showing promise for managing CR. However, the absence of data on neck range of motion is a limitation. This research underscores the complexity of managing CR and emphasizes the need for ongoing postoperative monitoring.

Rib Reduction Technique in Patients with Isolated Chondrocostal Chest Wall Prominence Undergoing Breast Augmentation.

INTRODUCTION: When planning for breast augmentation, it is important to consider not only implant choice, surgical technique and patient desires, but also the chest wall shape and deformities or irregularities, which remain often underestimated. They can be responsible for implant malposition and breast asymmetry after augmentation. Chondrocostal junction prominence is a minor but frequent chest wall deformity. The aim of this study is to report a new technique for sculpturing isolated chondrocostal prominence deformities in patients undergoing breast augmentation. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted to review surgical outcomes of a novel technique for costal prominence sculpturing and reshaping in patients undergoing breast augmentation. After reaching the subpectoral space, an inferiorly-based perichondral-periosteal flap is harvested just above the prominence. Once the deformity is corrected, the perichondral flap is repositioned over the sculpted rib. RESULTS: A total of six patients presenting with isolated chondrocostal prominence underwent bilateral breast implant placement and costal reduction using the described technique. Three patients were primary augmentations while the remaining patients were two secondary breast augmentation and one augmentation mastopexy. No complications were reported. No additional pain was referred at the side of rib remodelling in comparison with the contralateral breast. All the patients were satisfied with cosmetic results. CONCLUSIONS: The described technique for contouring of isolated chondrocostal deformities is fast, easy reproducible and offers advantages over the standard partial rib reduction technique. It can prevent implant malposition and projection asymmetry, eventually enhancing breast augmentation outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Fourteen-Year Experience in Burn Eyelid Reconstruction and Complications Recurrence: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Loss of vision and other ocular defects are a concern with eyelid burn sequelae. This most commonly progresses from eyelid contracture to cicatricial ectropion and lagophthalmos. When left untreated, these may lead to exposure keratitis, ulceration, infection, perforation, and loss of vision. In the case of full-thickness eyelid burns, release and grafting are required. However, there is a paucity of studies on outcomes in eyelid burn surgery treatment, despite concern for permanent ocular damage or loss of vision. The aim of the study is to describe the complication rates in burn eyelid reconstruction at a single center for 14 years. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed of all patients who had sustained eyelid burns and required reconstruction between April 2009 and February 2023. Medical records were obtained from patients' charts. Collected data include demographics, medical history, type of injury, indication for surgery, procedure performed, and complications. RESULTS: A total of 14 patients and 25 eyelids underwent eyelid reconstruction of the 901 total patients with burn-related injuries requiring plastic surgery reconstruction. These patients underwent 54 eyelid surgeries with a mean follow-up time of 13.1 ± 17.1 months. Patients were 71% men and 29% women, with a mean age of 45.1 ± 15.6 years. In 53.7% (n = 29) of the cases, the simultaneous reconstruction of both the upper and lower eyelids was necessary. The reconstruction of the upper and lower eyelid alone represented a smaller percentage (25.9% and 20.4%, respectively). On average, the patients received 3.9 ± 3.5 eyelid surgeries. The overall complication rate was 53.7% (n = 29). The most common complication was ectropion (42.6%, n = 23). Other complications included eye injury (25.9%, n = 14), lagophthalmos (24.1%, n = 13), local infection (7.4%, n = 4), and graft loss (5.6%, n = 3). CONCLUSION: Periorbital burns represent a major challenge that may require complex surgical intervention. Full-thickness skin graft remains the standard of care for patients with eyelid burns. However, there is a high incidence of ectropion that may require reoperation. Further studies examining the conditions of successful eyelid burn procedures may provide guidance on when patients may benefit from eyelid reconstruction during their burn treatment.

Risks and Complications Rate in Liposuction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Liposuction is a surgical procedure used to remove localized excess adipose tissue. According to The Aesthetic Society's annual report, liposuction was the most commonly performed cosmetic procedure. Despite its popularity, existing literature lacks a unified understanding of risks associated with liposuction. This study aims to measure complications of liposuction. A systematic review and meta-analysis was reported according to PRISMA guidelines and registered on PROSPERO database (CRD42023471626). The primary outcome was overall complication rate. The absolute risk for individual complications was also assessed. From 2,957 articles, 39 studies were selected for analysis. In total, 29,368 patients were included, with a mean age of 40.62 years and mean BMI of 26.36 kg/m2. Overall, the rate of any complication was 2.62 [95% CI: 1.78; 3.84]. The most common complication was contour deformity, with a prevalence of 2.35% [95% CI: 1.05%; 5.16%]. The prevalence of hyperpigmentation was 1.49% [95% CI: 1.12%; 1.99%], seroma 0.65% [95% CI: 0.33%; 1.24%], hematoma 0.27% [95% CI: 0.12%; 0.60%], superficial burn 0.25% [95% CI: 0.17%; 0.36%], allergic reaction 0.16% [95% CI: 0.050%; 0.52%], skin necrosis 0.046% [95% CI: 0.013%; 0.16%], generalized edema 0.041% [95% CI: 0.0051%; 0.32%], infection 0.020% [95% CI: 0.010%; 0.050%], venous thromboembolism 0.017% [95% CI: 0.0060%; 0.053%], and local anesthesia toxicity 0.016% [95% CI: 0.0040%; 0.064%]. Liposuction is a safe procedure with low complications of which contour deformity is the most common. Raising awareness of specific risks can enhance surgical outcomes and improve patient-physician alliance.

Soft Tissue Reconstruction.

Autologous fat transplantation has revolutionized soft tissue reconstruction, but conventional methods remain unpredictable as graft resorption rates are high due to lack of vascularization. The advent of adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) has led to improvement of fat grafting outcomes, in part to their ability to undergo facile differentiation into adipose tissue, their angiogenic properties, and their ability to express and secrete multiple growth factors. This chapter discusses the isolation and characterization of human ASCs, its expansion in vitro, and relevant in vivo models for adipose tissue engineering.

Technical Refinements for Reducing Reoperations in Single-Stage Augmentation Mastopexy: A Retrospective Matched Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: The goals of mastopexy differ significantly from those of augmentation mammoplasty. Mastopexy is designed to lift and reshape the breasts, while augmentation mammoplasty is designed to increase the volume of the breasts. This conflict causes that one-stage augmentation mastopexies showed a revision rate from 8.7 to 23.2%. The aim of our study is to present some technical refinements for reducing the risk of implant exposure and reoperation. METHODS: We designed a retrospective matched cohort study, including 216 consecutive patients, undergone augmentation mastopexy between January 2013 and December 2022. We divided them in two groups: Group A undergone an inverted-T superomedial pedicled augmentation mastopexy and Group B undergone our inverted-T modified augmentation mastopexy. The groups were matched for clinical and surgical variables, with the surgical technique the only difference between the two. RESULTS: Complications were registered in ten patients (9.3%) in Group A (two wound breakdowns at T with implant exposure and eight wound dehiscences), six of which required surgical revision. In contrast, only three patients (2.8%) in Group B reported a complication, which was wound dehiscence without implant exposure in all cases. None of the dehiscence required surgical revision. The difference between complication and revision rates was statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Separating the implant and the mastopexy dissection planes reduces the implant exposure and the reoperation rate in one-stage augmentation mastopexy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors https://link.springer.com/journal/00266 .

Reply to Comment to: Tuberous Breast Associated with Chest Wall Deformity: A Challenging Planning for Breast Augmentation.

Even in cases of noticeable breasts asymmetry, such as in our case, it is advisable to use implants with the same volume and projection, in order to maintain a similar breast footprint and allow a similar aging behavior over time. This can be achieved by reducing the size of the larger breast, thereby addressing the volume discrepancy before the placement of the implants. However, in our case, the skeletal deformities resulted in a significant disparity in the projection of the right and left sides of the chest wall, hindering the use of breast implants with identical projection. Therefore, due to this asymmetrical chest wall deformity, the left prosthesis was placed behind the central and lateral glandular parenchyma, avoiding hyper-projection in the medial part of the breast.Level of Evidence V This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

A Bibliometric Analysis of the 50 Most Cited Articles on Body Contouring Surgery After Massive Weight Loss.

BACKGROUND: Body contouring surgery after massive weight loss has emerged a safe and reliable option to improve self-esteem, social life, work ability, physical activity, and sexual activity, and it is considered as an essential step in the multidisciplinary approach to morbid obesity. In this study, we aim to provide a comprehensive overview of the current state of literature on body contouring after massive weight loss, identifying research trends and areas for future investigation. METHODS: The Web of Science Core Collection was used to identify the 50 most cited publications on post-massive weight loss surgery. Data collected from each article included: title, journal, publication year, total citations, average citations per year, authors, study type, study topic, country, and institution of origin. RESULTS: The top 50 most-cited articles include 44 original articles and 6 review articles. The most cited article, published by Lockwood in 1991, received a total of 224 citations. The research areas included surgical outcomes and complications (n=19, 38%), psychological aspects such as body image, quality of life and desire for body contouring procedures (n=18, 36%), surgical techniques (n=11, 22%), an anatomical study (n=1, 2%), and a classification system (n=1; 2%). Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery journal published most (44%) of the papers identified. The University of Pittsburgh was the single institution that contributed the most (n=11; 22%). CONCLUSION: This bibliometric analysis provides insights and research trends for clinicians interested in body contouring after massive weight loss, facilitating the understanding and evolution of post-bariatric surgery and elucidating the rationale behind current practice. NO LEVEL ASSIGNED: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each submission to which Evidence-Based Medicine rankings are applicable. This excludes Review Articles, Book Reviews, and manuscripts that concern Basic Science, Animal Studies, Cadaver Studies, and Experimental Studies. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Reply to: A Two-Step Approach for Breast Augmentation with Chest Wall Deformity?

Patients asking for cosmetic breast surgery often appreciate that their breasts have an unpleasing appearance, but they often do not have a full appreciation of the degree of potential anatomic abnormalities of the chest wall and of the specific anatomical characteristics, which require a meticulous surgical planning and techniques in comparison with a standard breast cosmetic surgery. Failure to recognize this will predispose the patient to an unsatisfactory outcome and secondary deformities. To maximize surgical predictability and patients' satisfaction, the authors proposed a two-stage approach in the scenario of patients presenting with chest wall deformities and asking for breast augmentation. However, as we contemplate adopting the authors' approach to our case, we anticipate encountering two primary challenges. Firstly, utilizing custom-made 3D silicone implants might exacerbate the projection of the chondrocostal prominence present in our patient. Indeed, we believe that these implants are more beneficial for addressing concave defects (such as pectus excavatum) rather than convex prominences, as observed in our case.Level of Evidence V This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Plastic Surgery in Burn Care: A Call for Enhanced Burn Surgery Training Within Plastic Surgery Residency Programs.

ABSTRACT: A 10 year cohort of patients admitted to a verified burn unit were analyzed to assess the role of plastic surgeons in the operative management of those patients. All 3843patients were admitted during this study period. Of these, 1509 of those patients underwent surgical procedures. Plastic surgeons performed 658 operations on these patients, including acute and delayed reconstruction of hand and facial burn injuries. In this population, plastic surgeons played a critical role in acute and reconstructive burn injuries in anatomically complex areas. This series illustrates the need for plastic surgery training in burn care.

The Effect of Fat Grafting on Scars Hyperpigmentation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Hyperpigmented scars, particularly in exposed body areas, can be difficult to conceal and may evoke psychological distress. While the precise causes of scar dyschromia are not fully understood, alterations in melanogenic activity appear to hold more significance than changes in melanocyte quantity. Current treatments encompass laser interventions. However, it is essential to consider their costs and potential complications in relation to their limited proven effectiveness. Fat grafting has gained interest as a scar modulation technique due to its regenerative properties, and its efficacy in reducing scar hyperpigmentation is currently under investigation. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was reported according to PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were accessed. PROSPERO registration number is CRD42023457778. The primary outcome was a change in scar pigmentation after fat grafting. Pigmentation changes after fat grafting were calculated using the standardized mean difference (SMD) between baseline and postoperative scores according to POSAS and VSS scales. Bias assessment was conducted according to the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence quality assessment tool. RESULTS: A total of 8 articles meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria were identified, involving 323 patients with hyperpigmented scars treated with fat grafting. A significant difference in scar pigmentation was noted after treatment with fat grafting according to observers' ratings, with a SMD of - 1.09 [95% CI: - 1.32; - 0.85], p<0.01. The SMD for patient-reported scar pigmentation after treatment with fat grafting was - 0.99 [96% CI: - 1.31; - 0.66], p<0.01. Four studies provided objective measurements of melanin changes after fat grafting and revealed inconsistent findings compared to subjective observations. CONCLUSIONS: Fat grafting shows promise in ameliorating hyperpigmented scars based on subjective assessments, but further corroborating evidence from objective measures is required. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Comprehensive Criteria for Differential Diagnosis and a Surgical Management Algorithm for Occipital Neuralgia and Migraine Headaches.

The differential diagnoses and nuances of the surgical management of occipital migraine and occipital neuralgia have not been clearly discussed in the available literature. This study aims to highlight additional diagnostic features and offers an algorithm for the surgical treatment of occipital migraine and occipital neuralgia based on the vast experience of the senior author spanning over 23 years. A retrospective cohort study was conducted to review the number and distribution of patients who underwent surgical treatment for occipital migraine headaches and neuralgia and the signs and symptoms observed. Among the 660 patients who underwent surgical treatment for headaches within the territory of the greater occipital nerves, 86 patients underwent isolated deactivation of the greater occipital site (site IV) or combined greater and lesser occipital sites (site IV and site VI surgical). Within the isolated occipital headache group, 43 patients met the criteria for migraine headaches and 43 for occipital neuralgia. Our additional observation on the differences between the occipital neuralgia and migraine groups included that occipital neuralgia is more commonly unilateral, less commonly familial, and more commonly associated with a whiplash-type injury. In addition, the patient with occipital neuralgia can consistently identify the distinct point of pain using the index finger. An ultrasound Doppler signal can also be detected at the pain site and a pulse is often palpable in the site identified by the patient. Occipital neuralgia is also commonly continuous and unrelenting, with occasional spikes of shooting pain, and is less likely to respond to botulinum toxin-A injection. Patients with occipital neuralgia often have a single-site headache while patients with migraine headaches often suffer from headaches in multiple sites. Additional clinical criteria are offered for the differential diagnosis of occipital migraine headaches and occipital neuralgia based on the vast experience of the senior author and the developed surgical management algorithm.

A 10-Year Single-Burn Center Review of Free Tissue Transfer for Burn-Related Injuries.

Skin grafting is the mainstay treatment in burn patients. However, in the scenario of soft tissue deficit along with exposure of critical structures, free flap is the only reconstructive option to provide adequate coverage. The aim of the study is to review indications and surgical outcomes of burn patients requiring free tissue transfer. A retrospective cohort study was conducted to review all patients who underwent free tissue transfer for burn-related injuries between March 2012 and June 2023. A total of 13 patients required a free flap for their reconstruction. Eleven flaps were performed during the acute care and 2 were performed for delayed reconstruction. Patients were 69% males and 31% females, with a mean age of 45.5 ± 16 years and a mean BMI of 25.4 ± 6.5. The mean follow-up was 13.5 ± 13.9 months. Indications for free tissue transfer were bone exposure (92%) and severe neck burn contracture (8%). Overall complications rate was 54%. Complications included free flap loss (15%), hematoma (15%), vein thrombosis of the anastomosis (15%), infection (8%), amputation (8%), and wound healing issues (23%). Overall, 38% of the patients required re-operations including venous anastomosis revision, hematoma evacuation, debridement, skin grafting, and debulking. Although sometimes free flap remains the only reconstructive option in severe burn-related injuries, it is only rarely used. However, they carry a high risk of complications and should be considered only as the last resort for limb or life-threatening situations.

Tuberous Breasts Associated with Chest Wall Deformity: A Challenging Planning for Breast Augmentation.

Tuberous breast deformity is characterized by a deficiency in the vertical and horizontal dimensions of the breast, as well as breast underdevelopment and asymmetry. Concomitant chest wall deformities are not uncommon and increase the difficulty when planning breast augmentation in such patients. We present a unique case of tuberous breasts and chest wall deformity successfully treated employing a novel technique that incorporated breast implants and fat grafting. A 24-year-old patient with no significant past medical history presented to the plastic surgery clinic seeking correction of a severe breast asymmetry and desiring increase in breast volume. The right breast was Grolleau type 1 cup A, while the left breast was Grolleau type 3 cup C. The left hemithorax presented an accentuated prominence of the costochondral junction of 4th left rib, along with minor prominence of the 3rd and 5th left ribs. In addition, the 5th and 6th ribs were fused together. The surgical plan involved bilateral augmentation with implant and fat grafting. A 285 cc Motiva implant was placed subfascial on the right. Multiple refinements were necessary to the left breast, including areolar reduction, inframammary fold adjustment, and medial glandular modifications. A 140 cc Motiva implant was placed subfascial. Fat grafting was used in both breasts to enhance contour, projection and conceal the chest wall deformity. Postoperative recovery was uneventful, and results at 3-month follow-up showed improved breast symmetry and aesthetics.Level of Evidence V This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Comparison of split thickness skin graft versus full thickness skin graft for radial forearm flap donor site closure: A systematic review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The radial forearm flap (RFF) is one of the most commonly used flaps in reconstructive surgery. Split-thickness skin grafting (STSG) has traditionally been used for closure of the forearm. However, full-thickness skin grafting (FTSG) has gained in popularity to achieve more satisfactory results. The aim of the study is to identify the best RFF donor site closure technique by comparing the functional and aesthetic outcomes of STSG and FTSG. METHODS: PubMed and EMBASE databases were queried. Only studies comparing complications rate, functional and aesthetic outcomes between STSG and FTSG were included. The primary outcome was graft failure rate. Secondary outcomes included the aesthetic result and functionality of the forearm/wrist. RESULTS: A total of 13 studies were included in this review, accounting for a total of 712 patients with mean age of 60.7 years. Overall, 348 patients underwent FTSG and 377 underwent STSG. The mean follow-up was 14.7 months. The rate of graft failure in FTSG was significantly higher compared to STSG (OR: 2.79, 95 % CI 1.38-5.65, p = 0.004). There was no significant difference in rate of tendon exposure (OR: 0.83, p = 0.65) and infection (OR: 1.37, p = 0.42). Regarding the aesthetic outcome, no significant difference between FTSG and STSG based on observer (SMD = -0.37, p = 0.17) and patient (SMD = -0.016, p = 0.93) assessment, respectively. Overall postoperative functional assessment showed a not severely impaired hand and arm function in both groups. Subjective evaluation of pain was similar between groups. CONCLUSION: FTSG is associated with higher risk of graft failure than STSG in RFF donor site closure, without significant improvement in aesthetic results.